Riding the Retirement Income Wave

As more of the nation’s baby boomers make the leap into retirement, it becomes critical for financial services firms to position themselves as trusted guides in the retirement space. Whether it be to retain relationships with customers transitioning into retirement, or to attract new customers making the move, meeting the income needs of retirees continues to gain in importance and priority for financial services leaders.

In particular, the impact of the country’s latest recession on retirement savings has brought the issue of guaranteed retirement income to the forefront of the discussion. While some form of guaranteed income has long been suggested by industry experts as a component of a prudent retirement saving strategy, the sting of the recent market hit on retirement assets has converted many previous hold-outs to the idea.

With this background, what are expectations for retirement income today, and how can providers meet those needs? With more personal responsibility for their retirement income and longer retirements, the income needs of today’s pre-retirees differ significantly from those of their older retiree counterparts who have benefited from pension incomes. Retirement income generally means three things to those making the momentous transition today: 1) a regular stream of income that 2) provides a “pre-retirement” lifestyle, 3) while allowing investment principal to remain untouched.

The question remains, how do financial services providers meet all of these criteria? Is this wish list realistic? The most successful providers will come close, and their solutions will come in the form of innovative services, products and advice.

Yet while some new product innovations have made traction, the clear winner has yet to materialize. The vast majority of retirees and pre-retirees report being familiar but uninterested in these products to date (with only 15% owning and another 1% indicating they plan to own retirement income products).

Key barriers for providers to address include: the idea that they can manage their income without help, or that they are not worried about outliving their savings (the high-net-worth), or more the commonly discussed aversion to giving up any control of principal.

Today’s retirement income strategies most often include bond/CD laddering and variable annuities, with less interest in innovations like absolute return funds or target payout funds. Only time will tell if the struggle of today’s retirees in the face of a recession will cause significant change in attitudes and behavior, or become a distant memory to pre-retirees of the future.

One thing is clear for now- the opportunity for leadership is wide open. Most retirees and pre-retirees cite brokerage firms, mutual fund firms and insurance companies equally as often as the ideal providers of these solutions (although insurance companies are preferred more by the more affluent). Building on strong existing relationships could be a winning strategy, with most citing “I already use and like them” as the reason they would consider a provider for their retirement income needs.

For more information on retirees’ and pre-retirees’ plans for retirement income, as well as their appetite for specific retirement income products and an evaluation of leading retirement income providers, check out Cogent Research’s In-Retirement Income™, available now.

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

Study Confirms Self-Directed Investors Are Driving ETF Popularity and Growth

Investor Brandscape(Press release) According to a newly released study by Cogent Research, nearly two-thirds of affluent investors who own ETFs say they purchased these products with no help from an advisor.  In light of this, it is not surprising that self-directed investors have higher awareness levels of ETF providers and are more likely to increase their usage in the future.  These and other findings are revealed in the 2010 Investor Brandscape™ report based upon a survey of 4,000 affluent investors.  The study demonstrates how critical self-directed investors are to the continued acceptance and growth of ETFs.  It also points to the challenges facing ETF providers that may be overly dependent on advisor-sold product distribution.

“Given the high engagement level of self-directed investors with ETFs, it’s no wonder that providers are now focused on addressing the needs of this important audience,” said Christy White, Cogent Research Co-Founder and Principal.  White points out that one compelling reason for rethinking traditional distribution models is the fact that 40% of current self-directed ETF owners say they plan to increase their use of these products, compared to just 26% of advised ETF owners who expect to do the same.

An unexpected accelerant of the direct distribution model for ETFs is the fact that not only are self-directed investors comfortable buying ETFs, but advised investor also believe they can purchase these products without the assistance of their advisor.  In fact, nearly one in four advised investors that currently own ETFs say they bought these products on their own.

Self-directed ETF owners, overall, are twice as likely as their advised counterparts to be aware of major ETF providers (38% on average for self-directed; 18% on average for advised).   Among the major ETF providers, Vanguard is perhaps best positioned to capitalize on the wave of opportunity among self-directed investors.  While awareness of the firm as an ETF provider is currently lower than that of iShares among self-directed investors, those who recognize Vanguard as an ETF provider view the firm much more favorably than those familiar with any other ETF provider.  Furthermore, Vanguard garners significantly higher loyalty from its ETF customers than any other provider.

“Right now, Vanguard is sitting in the cat bird’s seat when it comes to capturing market share among self-directed ETF investors,” said John Meunier, Cogent Research Co-Founder and Principal.  “But with big players like Charles Schwab entering the space, and the recent announcement of a strategic distribution agreement between iShares and Fidelity, it’s pretty obvious everybody wants a piece of the action.

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

What are they saying about Investor Brandscape?

Investor BrandscapeAs you may know, we recently released Investor Brandscape 2010, a report based on a national survey of 4,000 affluent investors. Tracking the attitudes and behaviors of affluent investors since 2006, the report explores investors’ awareness, perceptions, usage, share of wallet, and loyalty to the top investment distributors, mutual fund managers, ETF manufacturers, and VA providers in the US today.

Last week we sent out a press release revealing that Fidelity is displaced as the top distributor and mutual fund provider, and the press were quick with their reactions:

You can view a complete updated list of news articles regarding Investor Brandscape and other Cogent Research reports on our website, www.cogentresearch.com.

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

Press Release: Fidelity Displaced as the Top Distributor and Mutual Fund Provider, According to 2010 Investor Study

CAMBRIDGE, MASS., (January 19, 2009) – As the result of significant shifts in brand perceptions, household penetration, as well as changes in investor loyalty, Fidelity Investments has forfeited its position as both the number one distributor and mutual fund provider to key rivals Charles Schwab and Vanguard. These results are included in Cogent Research’s recently released 2010 Investor Brandscape™ report.

The report is based on a representative survey of 4,000 affluent and high net-worth investors in the United States.  The rankings for distributor firms and mutual fund companies are based on Cogent’s proprietary CoRe Score™ which combines brand equity, customer loyalty, market penetration, client mix, and share of wallet to produce a composite measure for individual firms and a comparative ranking of all major firms across the industry.  Cogent has been tracking CoRe Score™ results since 2006.

According to Cogent Research, different factors are at play in Fidelity’s decline in the distributor and mutual fund categories.  As a distributor, Fidelity has been hurt by lower awareness and favorability ratings toward the brand.  In addition, Fidelity’s household penetration has diminished substantially. In contrast, Schwab did not see a significant drop in investor impressions this year.  Meanwhile, it has done a better job attracting affluent clients and holding on to their assets.

Market dynamics appear to be contributing to Fidelity’s challenges.  Specifically, Investor Brandscape™ reveals a decline in the number of investors using 401(k) plans.  In fact, for the first time ever, affluent investors now report having more dollars allocated to IRAs than to employer-sponsored retirement plans. “It would appear,” said Meredith Lloyd Rice, an author of the report, “that Fidelity is caught in a perfect storm comprised of an aging population, higher unemployment, and lower across the board plan participation.”

Top 10 Distributor Firm CoRe Score™ Rankings

  1. Charles Schwab
  2. Fidelity Investments
  3. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
  4. Edward Jones
  5. Merrill Lynch
  6. Raymond James
  7. UBS
  8. Vanguard
  9. Wells FargoAdvisors/Wachovia Securities
  10. Ameriprise

Whereas multiple elements of the CoRe Score™ are impacting Fidelity’s distributor ranking, on the mutual fund side the issue is more focused around loyalty.  Whereas Vanguard has actually improved its relationship with investors over the past year as a mutual fund provider, Fidelity has seen a decline in loyalty.  An analysis by Cogent of the specific drivers of loyalty, including financial stability and range of products, as well as fund performance shows Vanguard performing better than any of its rivals on these and other key drivers.  By contrast, Fidelity no longer ranks among the top five mutual fund companies on performance, a critical factor impacting loyalty.  Specifically, ratings for the firm on both mid-term and long-term performance have declined considerably over the past year.

“Needless to say, if investors perceive a decline in performance, it’s going to impact how they feel about the brand,” said Meunier.  “It’s worth noting however, that Fidelity remains a powerhouse and is probably better positioned than most other firms to make any necessary course corrections in the coming months.”

Top 10 Mutual Fund Company CoRe Score™ Rankings

  1. Vanguard
  2. Fidelity Investments
  3. American Funds
  4. T. Rowe Price
  5. TIAA-CREF
  6. Franklin Templeton
  7. Fidelity Advisor Funds
  8. Oakmark
  9. Morgan Stanley Investment Advisor Funds
  10. Schwab/Laudus Funds


About Cogent Research

Cogent ResearchCogent Research helps clients gain clarity, obtain perspective, and formulate direction on critical business issues. Founded in 1996, Cogent provides custom research, syndicated research products, and evidence-based consulting to leading organizations in the financial services, life sciences, and consumer goods industries. Through quality research, advanced analytics, and deep industry knowledge, Cogent Research delivers data-driven solutions and strategies that enable clients to better understand customers, define products, and shape market opportunities in order to increase revenues and grow the value of their products and brands.

# # #

Media Contact:

Meredith Lloyd Rice
(617) 715-7630
mlloydrice (at) cogentresearch.com

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

Affluence And Retirement: Is Billion The New Million?

What would you do if you had a million dollars? We’ve all been asked that question before, and I’m willing to bet part of your answer included “quit my job.” Given today’s economic climate, we might have to take a step back and wonder, is a million enough for retirement? Conventional wisdom dictates that high net-worth, affluent individuals, especially millionaires, should have more than enough to comfortably retire when and how they want to. But money isn’t everything, and that statement couldn’t be truer than in today’s bear market.

Cogent’s recent study of high net-worth investors* (HNWIs) reveals that even the affluent are shaken. However, there are distinct similarities and differences between individuals at the low, mid, and high levels of the affluence spectrum.

As a result of the market’s downturn, 20% of investors in the $1M+ asset class have become less confident that they will be able to retire when they want to. Investors in the $999-250K and <$250K asset classes are even less likely to be confident they will meet their retirement date.

When asked what actions they have taken in response to the current economy, a small portion of investors polled have delayed their expected retirement date, and moderately affluent individuals are 50% more likely to have done so than their lower and higher net-worth counterparts. Approximately one-quarter to one-third of HNWIs in all asset brackets indicated becoming more involved with investment decision-making and changing their investment allocation. Of the investors using an advisor, one-fifth have increased the frequency in which they call or meet with them.

A trend observed predominantly within the lower-net-worth investors is, the less assets they have, the more likely they are to not only borrow money from a retirement account but also stop contributing to an IRA, 401(k) or 403(b), in a bear market. The most dramatic discrepancies are seen between the lowest and moderate affluent investors; they are significantly more likely to cease contributions than the millionaires, respectively.

Weighing equally heavy on all HNW investors’ minds are concerns regarding the market’s performance during retirement and maintaining their current standard of living. Thirty-four percent of non-retired millionaires are troubled by the possibility of outliving their assets, and as you can imagine the mid- and lowest-asset classes are even more distressed (47% and 45%, respectively). Covering the costs of heathcare is also a universal concern, but surprisingly more so for those in the middle of the affluence spectrum.

Individuals in the million-plus category are particularly concerned with inflation and the impact of taxes on their income. To a lesser degree, they are also worried about leaving a legacy for future generations. For non-millionaires, the availability of social security, or lack thereof, and financing their child(ren)’s education are significantly more worrisome than the aforementioned concerns of the millionaires.

Cogent ResearchCOGENT THOUGHT
A million dollars used to be the Holy Grail of retirement, a one-way ticket to Easy Street. Unfortunately, given today’s current economic climate, a million–or anything close to it–just doesn’t elicit the same sense of security. What will it take? How much is enough?  We’d love to hear your thoughts!

* This data is derived froma survey of a nationally representative sample of high net-worth U.S. investors having a minimum of $100K in investable assets (real estate excluded). For more information contact Cogent Research, info@cogentresearch.com, www.cogentresearch.com.

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

Beyond Demographics: Maximizing Marketing Efforts Using Attitudinal And Behavioral Segmentation

Retirees currently represent a sizeable segment of the U.S. population. As the baby boomers continue their march toward retirement, the population will get even larger.  Firms striving to understand the needs of retirees and near-retirees often focus in on specific groups within the population.  They typically apply this focus in a number of ways, examining groups based on their age, gender, asset-level, or marital status.  While in some ways this may be insightful, the utility of this approach to grouping is limited.  For example, let’s take a closer look at two retirees.

Mary and Janet are best friends who have each saved one million dollars for retirement.  They’re both 75 years old, widowed, and healthy.  Both rely on their retirement savings to make ends meet.  Most firms stop here and match a financial product that would work well for this “type” of retiree, given their demographic profile and asset level.

But, taking a closer look may reveal important and unique qualities that Mary and Janet do not share.  For starters, Mary didn’t plan very well for medical care.  If she were to take ill, most of her savings could be wiped out.  She is also very worried about her financial outlook and is scared of running out of savings.

On the other hand, Janet did plan for medical care so much of her savings can be used exclusively for making ends meet.  She is comfortable with her financial outlook and likes to play an active role in managing her funds.  So, while on the surface it may look like these women are very similar, in fact, the products they might be interested in for retirement will vary dramatically.  Most companies use demographic profiling to target particular customers for their products.  But this approach to the categorization of a group of people, based on incorrect assumptions, can often lead to hit and miss results.  In other words, harnessing your marketing efforts around only a demographic breakdown of the population leaves a lot of unidentified variables out of the equation, namely, how your customers feel and use you and your products.

SEGMENTING YOUR TARGET MARKET
When it comes to marketing, the goal is to identify new customers and enrich existing relationships.  Accordingly, from a marketing perspective, the motivation for segmenting consumers is simple: if one is armed with thorough knowledge of a consumer base, it allows for development of better products, creation of more relevant messaging, and, of course, more successful acquisition of new customers.  It allows firms to gain a more thorough understanding of how its brand is perceived relative to its competitors.  So what are the most effective segmentation efforts?  We will focus on two of the most revealing types of segmentation studies that can be relatively easily implemented by any organization: attitudinal and behavioral.

Attitudinal Segmentation
Attitudinal segmentation focuses on consumers’ feelings, interests, and needs in the marketplace.  Armed with the knowledge of how our customers and non-customers think and feel, we can gain a better understanding of how best to speak to our audience, either with engaging marketing programs, better packaging, or innovative new products.  Attitudinal studies typically expose groups of people who share a similar worldview in terms of shopping attitudes, the marketplace attitudes, and different perceptions of brands that currently occupy the landscape.  Identifying how consumers perceive these fundamental metrics is the first step to quantifying desired benefits, brand equity, preference, and overall brand perceptions.

So, how does one go about creating an attitudinal segmentation?   There are two vital elements to keep in mind:  Moreover, once the data is in, methodical examination of the population is also essential.

  1. Semantics matter. Creating the set of questions that are most indicative of significant attitudinal differences is one of the most challenging aspects of segmentation analysis.  The wording of the statements needs to clearly reflect all the different attitudes that may impact consumers’ usage, needs, and perceptions.  It is also important to make sure that the attitudinal statements are specific and clear, not vague or loaded with a double meaning or interpretation.  This adds error to the data and can make the interpretation of the statements difficult to determine.
  2. Remember the basics. Essentially, we need to be able to determine which segments are best to target given your marketing and sales objectives (e.g., how likely is Group A to buy Product X?).  Accordingly, segments must be evaluated in terms of some type of outcome measure which allows us to determine the viability of each of the groups.  Also, once the segments have been created, they must be profiled on demographics, usage, and any other descriptive variables that are relevant.
  3. Finding your target. Once target segments have been identified, further investigation may be required to test if any new implementations (product changes, marketing efforts, etc.) are received favorably.  This can be done using an algorithm that identifies segments in market.

Behavioral Segmentation
Behavioral segmentation focuses on how consumers behave within the market.  What products are they buying?  When and how do they purchase products?  With what types of media are they aware or familiar?  You can also examine which needs are being met and which are not based on specific attributes about the product or brand. In essence, behavioral segmentations allow you to find out:

  1. Why consumers like you? While attitudinal segmentation is best used to better plan how to speak to consumers, behavioral segmentation identifies groups with different patterns of behavior.  This helps you establish better programs to precisely fit the usage and needs of various groups.
  2. What consumers like about you? The primary benefit of behavioral segmentation is the ability to identify the specific (sometimes different) product features that are used by various groups.
  3. What is most useful about you? A common and useful outcome of this type of analysis is to identify features that are critical to consumers’ satisfaction with and loyalty to your products and your brand.  Conversely, the analysis will also reveal the features that may be outdated and need modification because no segment finds them useful.
  4. How do consumers find out about you? Examining media usage is an important step, as it provides knowledge about where to best place marketing efforts.

Which segmentation is best for my company?
The type of study you choose to employ should reflect the needs of the company and contribute directly to your objectives.  Although Cogent Research believes both approaches are relevant and actionable, there is some debate as to which approach will provide the most insight: is it better to understand product usage patterns and behavior or the differences in attitudes or motivations among your target population?

Let’s reconsider Mary & Janet for some direction.  Given their unique circumstances, it is critical to understand their attitudes toward retirement, particularly with Mary.  On the other hand, given Janet’s role in her finances, a behavioral segmentation could also be beneficial.  It would allow you to better understand Mary’s fears about running out of money and determine Janet’s needs by identifying the products that would benefit her most.

COGENT THOUGHT

Ideally, the segmentation you chose should align with the ultimate goal of your research initiative.  A good rule of thumb is to ask the question, “do we want to understand the behavior of consumers or do we want to understand how consumers think?”  What matters most is that the purpose of the research is clearly focused and that the resulting segments can be used throughout the organization to positively impact the bottom line.

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

What If You Threw A Retirement Party. . .And Nobody Came?

While investors and their financial advisors have long grappled with the myriad challenges associated with successfully migrating from the accumulation side of the retirement planning continuum to implementing strategies that provide ongoing and dependable in-retirement income, the wealth management industry seems convinced that both audiences are finally ready to act. And maybe they are. After all, the first wave of baby boomers is beginning to reach the traditional retirement age of 65. At the same time, Americans exhibit less confidence than ever in the Social Security system. Finally, one would be hard pressed to find a single retiree, at almost any income level, that isn’t afraid of what one serious health-related incident could mean for their finances, and by extension, their lifestyle in retirement. (more…)

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

The Five Reasons Financial Services Firms Need A Social Media Strategy

The writing is on the wall. An upsurge in social media participation and increasing accessibility to social media tools is signaling a revolution in the investor decision-making process. So how are investors engaged in, and impacted by, social media? What do you need to do about it? Cogent Research recently surveyed 1,000 US consumers and 1,056 investors with at least $100,000 in investable assets who are using social media for personal finance and investing to find out exactly what the buzz is all about. What we learned was compelling and insightful, and also, for the industry, a little nerve-racking. Social media technologies are giving investors tools that not only allow them to validate, but to also potentially changes their investment decisions. Access to and networks of like-minded investors represent a new variable in the investment decision-making equation. To help you effectively navigate this new landscape and engage in it successfully, we have boiled our findings down to 5 reasons social media should be included in your marketing efforts for 2008. (more…)

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

With A Little Help From My Friends: Socialpicks.com presents a unique opportunity for self-directed, tech-savvy investors

Glued to CNBC watching Cramer? Pouring through The Wall Street Journal? Wondering why you can see what people think of the dishwasher you’re planning to buy at sears.com, but not what others think about the mutual fund where you‟re going to park half of your child‟s college savings? If only you could get some candid advice, or, better yet, could examine the moves of an investing maven.

Now you can. (more…)

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare

Social Media vs. Advisors (round 1)

A complete stranger whom I’ve never met told me the other day that my retirement plan was not appropriate for my investment objectives. I met this “stranger” on wesabe.com, a site that describes itself as:

“An online community of real people just like you, with real financial goals and concerns.”

Advice from other people like me? That sounds comforting. People like me don’t have an agenda when it comes to making the right investment decisions. Are they saying the same things as my financial advisor, whom I pay for help with my real financial goals and concerns? (more…)

FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare